Neurofeedback Training   BETTER BRAINS Neurofeedback Training, San Diego  
 
          Home
Neurofeedback
ADD/ADHD
Sleep
Migraine
PTSD
Articles
Research
FAQ
Psychology /
Testing
Contact Us
International Society for Neuronal Regulation
2002 Conference, Phoenix AZ
10th Annual Conference
Abstracts of Scientific Presentation

 

Six Case Studies Examining the Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Adaptive
Approach to Neurofeedback for Attention Deficit in an Educational Setting

Shannon Warwick, MA candidate
Union Institute and University at Vermont College,
Asheville, North Carolina neuroreflections@main.nc.us


Introduction.


Six AD/HD elementary school students completed 19 hours of neurofeedback training over six months averaging 45 sessions.  Five of the six students measurably improved in parent/teacher report and/or objective data relatively congruent with QEEG analysis. Improvement seemed related to lower theta/beta
ratios. This comprehensive adaptive approach is theoretically based upon restoring neurological flexibility and resilience, allowing circadian rhythms to renormalize and functionality to emerge (Brown, 2002).


Method.


Three male and three females, ranging 9-12 years old, attending a private learning center specializing in dyslexia were previously diagnosed with AD/HD. Five out of six were taking 15- 20mgs of various psychostimulant medications. Evaluation measures included QEEG analysis with theta/beta ratios (Monastra, et. al, 1999; Lubar et al, 2001), IVA, Stroop, WISC-III ACID subtests, ADDES behavior ratings and a Likert scale of improvement evaluation. QEEG data was analyzed in terms of absolute and relative magnitude, as well as in terms of theta/beta ratios. Theta-beta ratios averaged across 19 channels ranged from 1.40 to 7.69.  Active electrodes sited at C3 and C4, referenced and grounded on ipsilateral ear lobes, input to two channels of the ProComp+ that fed data to a KeyData laptop accommodating NeuroCarePro software with dual monitor capability. Approximately thirty-second baselines were recorded before and after each session. Inhibits targeted 2-6 Hz delta/theta, 8-13 Hz alpha under eyes open conditions, and 23-38 Hz high beta at all times, producing visual and auditory feedback when the emergent median remained within a neighborhood defined by no more than 80% divergence. Feedback for all targets, including augments, was disabled by default if excursions occurred outside inhibit boxes. Visual and auditory information also reflected feedback if the mean of the median remained within 12-15 Hz SMR on the right, 16-20 Hz beta on the left, 21 Hz and 40 Hz, either separately or simultaneously using comprehensive portals. Excursions outside augment boxes had no effect on other targets. Changes were monitored by NeuroCarePro snapshot spectral analysis comparatives.


Results.


Medication titration began within 7-10 sessions. The only child not on medication maintained unprecendented straight A’s and is returning to mainstream schooling. One student discontinued medication and four reduced to half the original dosage, two of which demonstrated consistent success in cognitive measures, transfer of benefit, and stabilization of medication reductions. Two with severe theta/beta ratios were inconsistent in measures and returned to two-thirds and original dosage levels respectively with positive report the last two weeks of school. QEEG analysis echoed other measures in varying degrees consistent with previous findings (Chabot, Merkin, Wood, Davenport, & Serfontein, 1996). http://www.snr-jnt.org/newspluss/2002/papers2002.htm (41 of 45)12/30/2006 5:48:37 AM SNR 2001


Conclusions.


Without a control group cross-validating results, a systematic simultaneous procedure under relatively controlled conditions with single case studies can be regarded as a between-person replication of objective and subjective data (Barabasz, Barabasz, & Blampied, 1996). The present study replicates findings five out of six times in support of previous results found in
neurofeedback research (Lubar & Lubar, 1984; Lubar, Swartwood, Swartwood, & O’Donnell, 1995; Linden, Habib, & Radojevic, 1996; Thompson & Thompson, 1998). That training effects were replicated with varying degrees of severity, on different types of psychostimulants, within a rotating schedule, following an adaptive protocol, increases confidence in the
effectiveness of this comprehensive approach to neurofeedback for AD/HD. One and possibly three-year follow up will assess longevity. Further research may confirm the seeming correlation between consistency of success and degree of theta/beta ratio.


References.


Barabasz, M., Barabasz, A., & Blampied, N. (1996). A primer of case study research in neurotherapy. Journal of Neurotherapy, 1 (4), 12-14.

Brown, V. (2002). The mean of the median: A new metric for targeting in clinical neurofeedback?
[Abstract] Journal of Neurotherapy 6 (1), 53-54.

Chabot, R. J., Merkin, H., Wood, L. M., Davenport, T. L., & Serfontein, G. (1996). Sensitivity and specificity of QEEG in children with attention deficit or specific developmental learning disorders.
Clinical EEG, 27 (1), 26-34.

Linden, M., Habib, T., & Radojevic, V. (1996). A controlled study of the effects of EEG biofeedback on the cognition and behavior of children with attention deficit disorders and learning disabilities.
Biofeedback and Self Regulation, 21(1), 35-49.

Lubar, J.O. & Lubar, J.F. (1984). Electroencephalographic biofeedback of SMR and beta for treatment of attention deficit disorders in a clinical setting. Biofeedback and Self Regulation, 9, 1- 23.


Lubar, J. F., Monastra, V .J., & Linden, M. (2001). The development of a quantitative electroencephalographic scanning process for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: Reliability and validity studies. Neuropsychology, 15, (1), 136-144.

Lubar, J. F., Swartwood, M. O., Swartwood, J. N., & O’Donnell, P. H. (1995). Evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback training for ADHD in a clinical setting as measured by changes in T.O.V.A. scores, behavioral ratings, and WISC-R performance. Biofeedback & Self-Regulation, 20 (1) 83-99.


Monastra, V., Lubar, J., Linden, M., VanDeusen, P., Green, G., Wing, W. et al. (1999). Assessing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via quantitative electroencephalography: An initial
validation study. Neuropsychology, 13 (3), 424-433.

Thompson, L. & Thompson, M. (1998). Neurofeedback combined with training in metacognitive strategies: Effectiveness in students with ADD. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 23 (4), 243-263.

 

For more information contact us at BETTER BRAINS

 


BETTER BRAINS NeuroFeedback Training 3790 Via de la Valle Suite 121 E, Del Mar, CA 92014     near San Diego (858) 232-7572